User Reviews of Oral Irrigators

The irrigator is used as one of the components for complex cleaning of teeth and gums, which is the prevention and sometimes treatment of diseases of the oral cavity. The owners of such devices are mostly satisfied with their own purchase, which is confirmed by their reviews. However, there are also negative opinions.

Oral cavity irrigator Aqualet LD-47

This hydrofloss is one of the most popular models on the market today. And that's what his masters say about him.

  Aqualet LD-47 Irrigator

The advantages of the device: the price-quality ratio is just great, plus there are 4 nozzles. Disadvantages: it is difficult to remove nozzles. After another visit to the dentist and on his urgent recommendation to buy an irrigator of the oral cavity, AqualetLD-47 appeared in our house. It is impossible to completely remove the food particles from the teeth, even using the most sophisticated brush, and a powerful jet of irrigator will be able to handle even the most inaccessible corners. The device is not small, but we have it on the sink, although it can be hung.There are 4 convenient attachments for each family member and several speeds of work, which allows you to choose the best option. The effect of the use is noticeable immediately, as the food crumbs just fly out of hard-to-reach places. Capacity perfectly enough for one cleaning and it is not required to add liquids in the process. We still buy a special tool for additional oral care, which we pour into the water tank, although it is quite expensive. We use the device a little more than a month, but I am pleased with the result. After each cleaning, as if she had just visited the dentist - absolute cleanliness. I do not like it, what a wonderful device it is!

Irina, 27 years old

 Nozzles to the device

Advantages: excellent cleaning of teeth, crowns, bridges and gums. Disadvantages: high price. The irrigator was recommended to me by the doctor. It represents a device with a pen with four nozzles of different colors. It has a reservoir for liquids and a container for storing nozzles. After brushing, the teeth somehow do not particularly feel the difference, but the gums really breathe, as they have just been massaged. At first glance, such a unit is an excess, but it only seems that way, especially it will be useful to people with crowns, bridges and braces.Good device.

Valentina Gennadievna, 58 years old

Advantages: cleans teeth well and massages the gums. Disadvantages: over time, began to leak, and after 2 years broke. The device worked properly for 2 years (I used it once a day), and then began to slowly break. Honestly there is oral irrigators and with a longer life. "Akvadzhet" will not buy more, better try something else.

Maxim, 35 years old

Gidrofloss from WaterPik WP-100 Ultra

This irrigator also enjoys well-deserved popularity, which is fully confirmed by the reviews. There are also dissatisfied users, but there are not so many of them.

 WaterPik WP-100 Ultra

Advantages: a lot of nozzles, good pressure, quiet. We bought this device, of course, for ourselves, and as a result we use the whole family. Thanks to this irrigator, the child loved to brush his teeth !!! It was very difficult for me to force the child to open his mouth and brush his teeth, and now I just invent a funny story, for example, about a machine in a car wash, and the child allows you to use a brush with toothpaste, and then this interesting device. By the way, to a large number of attachments, I bought an additional two universal ones so that each family member has his own.

Svetlana, 32 years old

Advantages: many tips. Disadvantages: short cord, high cost, insufficient water pressure, a lot of spray. Yes, the irrigator has many attachments, but not one came up to me. When used, I constantly flooded the entire sink and even the floor. The pressure from the device is weak, the effect is the same as from the usual rinsing of the mouth - nothing supernatural! Sorry for the money spent and effort. I do not recommend.Evgenia, 23 years old

 Nozzles hydrofloss WaterPik WP-100 Ultra

Advantages: it is convenient to adjust the pressure, a lot of nozzles, but I use only the usual. Disadvantages: the cord is short, uncomfortable cover, decent price. It has been working for 2.5 years, 2 times a day, there are no complaints about cleaning. The lid is uncomfortable in which the nozzles are stored. It is better not to use it, I just put it on the shelf. Now the device is already becoming ushatanom, but this is the normal life. I am pleased. I have no doubt what device I will buy next.

Vladimir, 45 years old

These reviews concern only the two most popular irrigators of the oral cavity, however, as practice shows, most of those who purchased this type of home appliances are satisfied with the result. Naturally, the models evoke criticism, therefore, it is better to determine the effectiveness of the irrigator independently.

Comments: 0
Continuing the theme:
Ratings

The best models of irrigators in the ranking of 2017. Features of the presented models and their important characteristics. Strengths and weaknesses in the opinion of users, as well as the price level.

Video camera

Home cinema

Music Center